The Neocloud Cartel: How the AI Industry Started Renting Compute From Itself

📊 Full opportunity report: The Neocloud Cartel: How the AI Industry Started Renting Compute From Itself on ThorstenMeyerAI.com — validation score, market gap, and execution plan.

TL;DR

In 2026, a small group of companies dominate AI compute by renting hardware from each other, creating a cartel centered around Nvidia. This control impacts AI development and market dynamics, but also introduces fragility.

In 2026, a small group of AI firms are now renting compute from each other, forming what experts describe as a ‘cartel’ that controls the core hardware supply. This shift has significant implications for the AI industry’s power structure and market dynamics.

Almost none of the leading AI companies own the machines they run on; instead, they lease GPU hardware from a handful of firms, notably Nvidia, which has become the central node in this network. Notably, xAI leased its supercomputer to Anthropic and Google for over $26 billion annually, despite owning the hardware, signaling a decoupling of ownership and use.

This leasing system has created a tightly interconnected financial loop, with companies like OpenAI, Meta, and Anthropic committing hundreds of billions of dollars in compute spending over the next decade. Nvidia, as the dominant supplier, invests heavily in these companies, effectively controlling the flow of GPU hardware and, by extension, access to AI development capabilities.

The circular nature of this market means that Nvidia and a few other chipmakers hold significant leverage, determining who gets GPU access through allocation decisions. This concentration of power makes the compute layer a chokepoint, where a small number of firms control a critical resource that impacts AI progress and market competition.

At a glance
reportWhen: developing, as of May 2026
The developmentThe article reports on how AI companies are increasingly renting compute from each other, forming a cartel led by Nvidia, with significant financial and strategic implications.
The Neocloud Cartel — The Control Series, Part 2: Compute
AI Dispatch · The Control Series · Part 2
Chokepoint 02 — Compute

The Neocloud Cartel

Almost no one racing to build AI owns the machine it runs on. They rent — increasingly from each other — and the money loops back to one chip maker that’s also an investor in nearly everyone at the table.

The loop — money, chips & credits circle a dozen firms
invests ~$100B commits ~$1.15T buy GPUs + equity stakes NVIDIA the chokepoint THE LABS OpenAI · Anthropic CLOUDS & CHIPS CoreWeave·Oracle·AMD ↻ each deal lifts the next one’s value
If it seems circular — it is.
Who actually holds the choke
01 · Upstream
Nvidia takes ~$35B of every $50B/GW
Captures most of every buildout dollar, holds equity in the buyers, and controls chip allocation in a shortage.
02 · The landlords
Rent means someone else’s terms
xAI’s lease reportedly lets Musk reclaim compute if Claude “harms humanity.” CoreWeave drew 77% of revenue from 2 customers.
03 · The financing
Suppliers fund their own buyers
Nvidia invests in OpenAI; AMD hands it warrants; Nvidia+MSFT back Anthropic $15B. The money never leaves the circle.
~$3T
datacenter spend ’25–’28 — half on private credit
−$74B
OpenAI projected operating loss, 2028
~3%
of consumers actually pay for AI
−60–75%
H100 rental rates from peak — commoditizing
The take

The cartel isn’t a conspiracy — it’s the endpoint of extreme capital intensity, real scarcity, and one dominant supplier. But the same circularity that makes it powerful makes it a fuse: each cancelled order is someone else’s missing revenue. Don’t be a price-taker at the bottom of a loop you don’t control — own your inference, keep an open-weight fallback, diversify silicon.

Sources: SpaceX filings; TechCrunch; The Register; Bloomberg; CNBC; Reuters; SemiAnalysis; McKinsey; Morgan Stanley; FT (2025–Jun 2026). Figures are reported commitments, often multi-year, not cash on hand.
thorstenmeyerai.com · 02 / 06

Implications of the AI Compute Cartel for Industry Control

This development signifies a shift in AI industry power, where control over hardware resources is concentrated in a small cartel led by Nvidia. It influences market competition, pricing, and innovation, with potential risks of fragility due to the circular financing and dependency structure. The control of compute resources could also impact geopolitical and regulatory considerations as access becomes more gatekept.

Amazon

Nvidia GPU cloud computing service

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Rise of the Neocloud and the Formation of a Compute Cartel

The AI industry has transitioned toward a model where hardware ownership is less common; instead, companies rent GPU compute from specialized hyperscalers known as ‘neocloud’ providers, such as CoreWeave and others. The GPU shortage in 2024–25 accelerated this trend, making leasing the only viable path to scale AI training.

By 2026, this leasing ecosystem has evolved into a tightly knit cartel, with Nvidia at its core. The company’s investments in AI firms and its control over GPU supply have created a situation where access to compute is effectively governed by a small set of firms, transforming the market into a chokepoint with systemic vulnerabilities.

“A gigawatt of AI data center capacity costs about $50 billion, with most of that flowing to Nvidia.”

— Jensen Huang, Nvidia CEO

Amazon

high performance AI GPU servers

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Unclear Risks and Potential Fragility of the Compute Cartel

While the cartel structure grants Nvidia and a few firms immense control, it also introduces systemic risks. The reliance on circular financing and dependency on a small number of suppliers could make the entire system vulnerable to shocks, such as supply disruptions or regulatory interventions. It is not yet clear how resilient this structure will prove in the face of such challenges.

Amazon

enterprise GPU leasing solutions

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Potential Regulatory and Market Responses to the Compute Concentration

As the control over AI compute becomes more centralized, regulators and industry stakeholders may investigate antitrust concerns or seek to diversify supply chains. Additionally, alternative hardware solutions or new entrants could challenge Nvidia’s dominance, though current barriers to entry remain high. Monitoring how these dynamics evolve will be critical in the coming months.

Amazon

AI hardware leasing platforms

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Key Questions

Why do AI companies prefer leasing GPU hardware instead of owning it?

Leasing allows companies to scale quickly without the long-term capital expenditure and logistical challenges of owning large hardware infrastructure, especially amid shortages and rapid technological change.

How does Nvidia control access to AI compute resources?

Nvidia’s dominant market share in GPU supply, combined with its strategic investments and allocation decisions, enables it to influence which companies get hardware and at what cost, effectively making it the gatekeeper of AI compute capacity.

What risks does the current compute leasing model pose to the AI industry?

The concentration of control creates systemic fragility; if Nvidia or other key players face disruptions or regulatory actions, it could impact AI development across the industry.

Could new competitors break Nvidia’s hold on AI hardware supply?

While technically possible, high barriers to entry, such as the need for massive capital and supply chain control, make it difficult for new entrants to challenge Nvidia’s dominance in the near term.

Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com

Nothing in this article is financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and precious-metal investments carry significant risk — do your own research and consider a licensed advisor.
You May Also Like

Traditional Finance at Risk? Balaji Says Crypto Will Overtake IPOs

How will Balaji’s prediction that crypto will outpace IPOs reshape the future of traditional finance? The answer might surprise you.

The Orchestration Layer Arrives: What Anthropic’s Finance Agents Mean for Bloomberg, FactSet, and Wall Street

Anthropic releases new AI-driven orchestration layer integrating multiple financial data providers, challenging Bloomberg’s UI moat and reshaping industry dynamics.

The Forecast Is the Plan.

Major AI labs publicly commit to automating AI R&D by 2026, signaling a strategic shift that could reshape the industry and workforce.

The Co-Founder’s Black Hole — A Structural Read on Jack Clark’s Automated AI R&D Essay

Jack Clark predicts over a 60% chance of fully automated AI research by 2028, raising concerns about institutional capacity and future unpredictability.